What is a Major Museum?

I just saw my third excellent museum show this spring.  In March, I was down at the San Jose Museum of Art for the Eric Fischl show.  My most recent trip across the Bay took me to the Oakland Museum where I was overwhelmed by Hung Liu’s retrospective show Summoning Ghosts: The Art of Hung Liu.  And on Saturday, I was down in Pasadena at the Pasadena Museum of California Art for California Scene Paintings from 1930 to 1960. 

I went into the Hung Liu show blind, knowing virtually nothing about the artist or her work.  This might be the best way to approach an artist that one is unfamiliar with.  When you “discover” and love the work, it makes it all the more exciting.  The exhibit site has background details and examples of her work.  More can be seen on Liu’s website.  The biggest surprise about the exhibit was that this outstanding, local artist was still unknown to me.  And while the San Francisco museums have all picked up her work for their collections, they certainly haven’t featured it and given Hung Liu the attention she deserves.  This might be a job for the Guerilla Girls. 

As “old fashioned” as it might be too some, I love representational, pre-abstract, pre-WWII, American painting – Edward Hopper, Thomas Hart Benton, Grant Wood et al.    If all three of them had headed west and settled in California, they would probably be part of the current show of California Scene Paintings in Pasadena.  It is full of work by artists I need to become more familiar with, names like Phil Dike and Emil Kosa, Jr. along with another California favorite – Millard Sheets. What’s particularly special about this show is that most the works are borrowed from private collections. They rarely get seen by the general public. 

The exhibit is more focused on Los Angeles and Southern California.  Many of the paintings have preserved rural scenes lost to suburban sprawl long ago.  There are also paintings of lost neighborhoods like Los Angeles’s Bunker Hill and Chavez Ravine — communities that were completely destroyed in the name of urban renewal and building freeways.  After seeing the show, driving down the Pasadena Freeway and coming to the interchange where The 5 and 110 meet, I was trying not to get too distracted imagining the hilltop neighborhood of Victorian homes that used to be in the same spot.

Seeing all three of these shows, reminds me of why I go to museums.  It’s all about exposing myself to work that influences me, often on a subconscious level, as well as my ongoing art education.  But I also can’t help noticing that I am seeing the best work in what many might dub small, or “second” or even “third tier” museums.  Few would call any of these three “major museums.”  But I have to begin to ask, just what makes a “major” museum?  Is it the hyped up blockbuster shows with high admission prices?  Is it sticking the Girl with a Pearl Earring’s mug on everything from a mug to shopping bag to a tie? We might need to revisit what really defines a “major” art museum.  Shouldn’t it be about the art instead of the hype?

Eric Fischl: The Best Show of 2012

I know it when I see it.  Every year I see, what for me, will be the best show of the year. Dive Deep: Eric Fischl and the Process of Painting at the San Jose Museum of Art takes the prize.  It is only March, and I might get to see something better in 2012, but I am pretty certain we have a winner.

I first discovered Eric Fischl about 10 years ago, saw a few paintings and now have his work in a few art books.  Since that time, I have been wanting and waiting to see a retrospective of his work.  I rarely get down to the San Jose Museum of Art, and, when I do, I am never disappointed.  Today I was, well, amazed.  I was expecting nothing more than an opportunity to see a few rooms full of big, bold paintings in person.  Work I only knew from the printed page.

Certainly I could have read more about the show beforehand.  The website has an excellent description and a video interview I recommend.  Yes, I recognize that I am suggesting you read up on the show, when I didn’t.  Over the years I have developed a serious case of hype-fatigue when it comes to museum shows.  So many museums go from blockbuster to blockbuster, hyping each show up like the latest action movie out of Hollywood.  I tend to tune out the press and just go see the art.

The folks in San Jose haven’t, by any means, hyped the show.  Sure, it’s been promoted, but with this exhibit, the energy is put into curation.  The show really lives up to the title, yes, you can just view the work on its own, but what is offered is true insight into the artist’s process.  There are plenty of big paintings.  But there are also studies, prints, watercolors, maquettes and photography that all lead up to those bigger paintings.  If you were new to Fischl’s work and only saw some of the small watercolors or the maquettes he starts with, you’d be impressed with those as finished work.  But this exhibit gives you a much, no pun intended, bigger picture.  There is also a short piece of film included where Eric Fischl discusses his process.  When I feel compelled to watch a film as part of an exhibit (something I never do), well, that alone says how much I think of the show.  The only thing missing, and I really have no complaints, but I would have liked to see an even bigger show and more of those massive Fischl paintings.

You have until May 12^th to see the best show of 2012.  So head down to San Jose soon.